[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Alex Beam column
- Subject: Re: Alex Beam column
- From: Sven Weil <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 23:18:32 -0400 (EWT)
I'm sure WEZE (Salem Communications) could buy and shut down TAG-58 -
that sort of thing is not unheard of (and not uncommon unfortunately).
ROW-59 in the C.D. might be more of a problem....
Sven F. Weil
World Wide Web: http://www.lily.org/~sven
On Fri, 4 Jun 1999, A. Joseph Ross wrote:
> On 4 Jun 99, Dan.Strassberg@worldnet.att.n wrote:
> The real beneficiary might
> > be WEZE, however. If 680 were gone from the Burlington
> > site, WEZE could probably use the site and could
> > probably increase its daytime power to 50 kW and get
> > some sort of increase in night power as well.
> Wouldn't that cause problems with WTAG 580 in Worcester and WROW 590 in
> A.Joseph Ross, J.D. 617.367.0468
> 15 Court Square firstname.lastname@example.org
> Boston, MA 02108-2503 http://world.std.com/~lawyer/