[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Alex Beam column
- Subject: Re: Alex Beam column
- From: "A. Joseph Ross" <lawyer@world.std.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 22:32:02 -0400
On 4 Jun 99, Dib9@aol.com wrote:
> I'm not an attorney but I think it is a stretch to call someone a public
> figure because their husband comments about them on the radio. Many one
> of our attorney friends can comment on the legal definition of the term
> "public figure" in regard to libel law.
I'm not up on libel law, but as I recall, there are several different
definitions. And there's a distinction between a public official and a
"public figure." There's also a distinction, in at least some of the
cases, between a person who has voluntarily become a public figure and one
who has had that role thrust upon him by events. One can be a public
figure for some purposes and not for others. And the spouse of a public
figure is not necessarily a public figure. The whole thing has to do with
balancing the freedom of public discourse against individual rights of
privacy.
==================================================================
A.Joseph Ross, J.D. 617.367.0468
15 Court Square lawyer@world.std.com
Boston, MA 02108-2503 http://world.std.com/~lawyer/
==================================================================
------------------------------