Re: WBZ and ABC (was: The Future of WBCN-- Talk????)

[Sven Weil <sven@lily.org>]

  I've never understood what the hoopla was about certain spoken
workd formats being on standard broadcast  or FM. 

 What difference does it
make whether news/talk stuff is on either band? It still sounds the same.
I can  understand choosing FM for music over MW but for voice?

Can someone please enlighten me? 

(Although I prefer the warmer [more muddy smome say] AM sound, I
must admit FM beats it with music that's heavy on treble).


- --
Sven F. Weil
e-mail: sven@lily.org
World Wide Web: http://www.lily.org/~sven


On Fri, 21 May 1999, Dan Strassberg wrote:

> At 12:35 PM 5/21/99 -0400, you wrote:
> >
> >How about an ABC o&o (and I don't mean Mouse Radio)?  A full-news ABC
> >outlet, perhaps an FMer to chase some of the daunting 'BZ numbers
> >all-around?  They'd have Silber to thank for showing that FM (albeit
> >non-comm.) can do NT.
> >
> Or maybe when rigor mortis sets in at One-on-One, ABC will buy 1510 and
> convert it to ESPN Radio. Of course, that depends on whether or not Disney
> has any assets left after Katzenberg gets through with Eisner.
> 
> -------------------------------
> Dan Strassberg (Note: Address is CASE SENSITIVE!)
> ALL _LOWER_ CASE!!!--> dan.strassberg@worldnet.att.net
> (617) 558-4205; Fax (617) 928-4205
> 
> 

------------------------------