[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tacky Awards ( February 1998)
- Subject: Re: Tacky Awards ( February 1998)
- From: "A. Joseph Ross" <lawyer@world.std.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 22:47:26 -0500
On 17 Feb 99, Bob Nelson wrote:
> I thought that a song parody that's available for sale had to be
> approved by the original copyright holders (at least it may have
> required this before
> the Supreme Court decision on parodies)...while something merely
> played on the radio (but not for sale) didn't have to be.
There are some special rules regarding copyrighted music, involving
compulsory licensing, but it's complicated and I'd have to look it up to
be familiar with the details. I think maybe you don't need permission to
sing a song, but you have to pay royalties to ASCAP, BMI, or whoever
for it. And if you sing the song with different words, I suppose it
works the same.
==================================================================
A.Joseph Ross, J.D. 617.367.0468
15 Court Square lawyer@world.std.com
Boston, MA 02108-2503 http://world.std.com/~lawyer/
==================================================================
------------------------------
End of boston-radio-interest-digest V2 #309
*******************************************