Late Night - Early AM on WBZ-AM is now Mr. Computer

[Paul B. Walker, Jr.]

Are you serious?

Why bother?

A.) Go a bit inland and that signal will drop off dramatically

b.) Few people wanna go through the trouble or even know they can lsiten to
far away AM's like that

c.) You listening in FL does nothing revenue or listener wise for WBZ



On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 7:11 AM Ron Bello <rbello@belloassoc.com> wrote:

> PS - Punching buttons on my car radio on Woolbright   Rd in Boynton Beach,
> FL recently produced a listenable WBZ on 1030 about a mile from the ocean.
> Why bother with the internet and the ability to listen to almost any radio
> station ?
>
>
>
>
> On Saturday, January 18, 2020, Kevin Vahey <kvahey@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > For what it's worth Morgan White is on WBZ early Saturday morning
> >
> > Back in the glory days of the 50K blowtorches, there was no way for these
> > stations to monetize their signal as there was no way to measure the
> > audience.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 1:15 AM Ron Bello <rbello@belloassoc.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Prices of radio stations went up until the internet drained ad $$ from
> >> radio, newspapers and other traditional media
> >>
> >> Listeners across the country never generated ad $$ for WBZ.  As margins
> >> have narrowed, the luxuries of  old time radio can no longer be paid
> for.
> >> Even in Larry Glick’s day the volume of advertising was small in the
> over
> >> night.  The world has and will continue to evolve.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Friday, January 17, 2020, A Joseph Ross <joe@attorneyross.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Funny, I thought the price of radio stations was getting higher and
> >> higher
> >> > after the Telecommunications Act.
> >> >
> >> > On 1/17/2020 1:28 AM, Ron wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> but up until about 1980 the focus in such companies used to be the
> long
> >> >>>>
> >> >>> term.
> >> >>
> >> >> And it was in radio as long as the value of radio properties was
> going
> >> up.
> >> >>
> >> >> But when the value of radio stations started to drop, and advertising
> >> >> revenue dropped, people become more focused on the "short term" (and
> >> >> survival).
> >> >>
> >> >> That is true, but the pressure on Congress and the FCC to change
> those
> >> >>>>
> >> >>> laws and regulations was applied by Wall Street.
> >> >>
> >> >> And it was up to our elected leader to read the bill, a bill that
> most
> >> of
> >> >> them thought was all about cell-phones.
> >> >>
> >> >> (This appeared to be one of those:  " "We have to pass the bill so
> that
> >> >> you
> >> >> can find out what is in it" moments.)
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: Rob Landry <011010001@interpring.com>
> >> >> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2020 2:21 PM
> >> >> To: Ron <obrienron2@gmail.com>
> >> >> Cc: 'Kevin Vahey' <kvahey@gmail.com>; 'bri' <BRI@bostonradio.org>
> >> >> Subject: RE: Late Night - Early AM on WBZ-AM is now Mr. Computer
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, 16 Jan 2020, Ron wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Wasn't Gannett, Westinghouse, Hearst, CBS, NBC, ABC, Metromedia and
> >> >>> the rest "publicly held companies driven, as usual, by short-term
> >> >>>
> >> >> financial goals"?
> >> >>
> >> >> They were publicly held companies, sure enough, but up until about
> 1980
> >> >> the
> >> >> focus in such companies used to be the long term. Remember when AT&T
> >> had
> >> >> Bell Labs, and other companies like IBM had similar divisions,
> >> >> experimenting
> >> >> with new technologies and the like?
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm sure stock price, dividends and such drove all those companies as
> >> >>> well, yet somehow they were able to service their communities,
> right?
> >> >>>
> >> >> The narrow focus on "maximizing shareholder value" was originally
> >> >> proposed,
> >> >> if I remember right, at Harvard Business School in the mid seventies.
> >> It
> >> >> didn't catch on generally until about a decade later, and the
> >> deregulation
> >> >> of the radio industry during the 80s and 90s allowed it free reign in
> >> our
> >> >> industry.
> >> >>
> >> >> Smaller, privately owned stations aren't doing much better.
> >> >>>
> >> >> We are all blown by the same economic winds.
> >> >>
> >> >> I think this has to do with the realities of the financial world,
> >> >>> where once valuable properties (assets) are now worth a pittance of
> >> >>> what they were purchased for.  Blaming "publicly held companies"
> >> >>> driven by their fiduciary responsibilities is an easy excuse.
> >> >>>
> >> >> Publicly held companies have obligations that privately held
> companies
> >> >> don't
> >> >> have; everything they do has to be reationalized in terms of
> >> shareholder
> >> >> value. A publicly held company can't, for instance, build a big
> rocket
> >> and
> >> >> send its CEO's car to Mars, as Elon Musk's privately-held SpaceX can.
> >> Nor
> >> >> can it employ people for their own sake, the sake of the communites
> >> they
> >> >> live in, or anyone else's sake but shareholders.
> >> >>
> >> >> I think when the FCC allowed and Congress removed the ownership caps
> >> >>> (through the "Omnibus Telecommunications Act") set the stage.
> (Always
> >> >>> watch out for anything with the adjective "Omnibus" attached.)
> >> >>>
> >> >> That is true, but the pressure on Congress and the FCC to change
> those
> >> >> laws
> >> >> and regulations was applied by Wall Street.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Rob
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> > --
> >> > A. Joseph Ross, J.D. · 1340 Centre Street, Suite 103 · Newton, MA
> 02459
> >> <
> https://www.google.com/maps/search/1340+Centre+Street,+Suite+103+%C2%B7+Newton,+MA+02459?entry=gmail&source=g
> >
> >> > 617.367.0468 · Fax:617.507.7856 · http://www.attorneyross.com
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ron Bello
> >> 160 Speen St - Suite 303
> >> <
> https://www.google.com/maps/search/160+Speen+St+-+Suite+303+%0D%0AFramingham,+MA.+01701?entry=gmail&source=g
> >
> >> Framingham, MA. 01701
> >> 508.820.1100
> >>
> >
>
> --
> Ron Bello
> 160 Speen St - Suite 303
> Framingham, MA. 01701
> 508.820.1100
>