Radio Discussion boards

[Douglas Broda]

One of the mods (I think the head one) has said, in sum and substance, 
we hear you but it's only been a month since we implemented this 
software, give us time.

IMO, if you install new software (which I suspect was instituted to 
serve ads, as well as for other reasons, which is certainly fine) and 
your participation goes directly into the toilet (minimizing the value 
of said ads), you have a problem that needs quick action lest you never 
get those participants back.

I commend to you what the esteemed Scott Fybush said so well at 
http://radiodiscussions.com/showthread.php?654437-Guys-I-m-sorry-but -- 
Scott's contribution, which is down the page, including both a reason 
new software was needed besides the ads and his wise thoughts on why the 
current situation is self-defeating.


On 9/16/2013 6:14 AM, Dan.Strassberg wrote:
> A few days ago, in a private message, I complained to the moderator 
> (moderator may be the wrong title) of the RD Boston board about 
> exactly this problem. I suggested that, if he were not the right 
> person to field such complaints, he should forward my message to the 
> right person. I have not heard word one in reply. Very few people have 
> the time or energy to learn the intricacies of how to use new software 
> to perform functions that existing software had been performing 
> satisfactorily for several years. From my viewpoint, 
> RadioDiscussions.com has become a flat-out disaster. Is there another 
> board that one can join as a substitute for R-D that does not require 
> such a long learning curve? If so,I would welcome suggestions.
>

-- 
Douglas J. Broda
Attorney at Law
Post Office Box 239
Troy, New York 12182
(518) 272-0580
Fax (518) 237-0949

NOTE: I do not regularly read emails from this account, other than those sent to mailing lists to which I subscribe, in order to minimize spam. If you need to reach me quickly and do not have my other email address, please feel free to call me.