"It's the programming, stupid!"
Fri May 18 08:35:42 EDT 2012
Why is it that local stations always blame the signal, not the programming?
Talk1200 has few listeners after spending $10 million to upgrade the AM
signal. But it's not the programming, it's that even with the upgrade, the
signal is still not very good, so they have to spend another $11 million to
buy a 1700 watt Class A FM station that barely makes it past Rte 128 if the
wind is blowing in the right direction. But it couldn't possibly be the
programming, despite there being two other similarly-oriented talk stations
WEEI dominated the sports audience for years (over WAMG and WWZN), but as
soon as WBZ-FM comes on, suddenly "it's the signal" and they have to
simulcast on 93.7 FM. It couldn't possibly be that people were looking for a
change and something new, it must be the signal.
I remember when Jerry Williams had a 50 share (yes, five zero) on the
peanut-whistle 5000 watts--jammed in between two powerhouses--WMEX. If the
programming is compelling, people will listen through the static and fades.
If the programming is crap, no matter how good your signal may be, people
will go elsewhere.
More information about the Boston-Radio-Interest