Media cross-ownership ban restored
Doug Drown
vzeej5wn@myfairpoint.net
Sat Jul 9 10:25:15 EDT 2011
How many such cross-ownerships still exist? I can think of only a
handful: WTMJ Milwaukee (Journal Sentinel), WSB Atlanta
(Journal-Constitution), KSL Salt Lake City (Deseret News), and WGN.
I'm scratching my head to come up with others. There used to be a
lot of 'em. -Doug
On Sat, 09 Jul 2011 12:59:46 +0000, Bob Nelson wrote:
http://articles.boston.com/2011-07-08/business/29752710_1_cross-ownership-media-ownership-rules-fcc
>
> A ban on media cross ownership (newspapers and TV stations under
> common ownership in same market) has been restored, despite some
> holding views that there is more than enough diversity of ownership
> and views. In some cases owners are grandfathered in (Chicago:
> Tribune, WGN). You may recall in 1994, Rupert Murdoch was forced to
> sell The Boston Herald (to his employee Patrick Purcell) since he
> couldn't own both that and WFXT-Ch 25. I remember Ted Kennedy (prob.
> no fan of the tabloid) calling in to the Jerry Williams show about it.
>
> >>The decision is a setback for media conglomerates, which argue
> that consumers have more sources of information than ever in an age
> of 24-hour cable television and an endless supply of online news
> outlets
>
> Is there enough media ownership diversity out there? I will note
> that the rule affects newspapers and
> TV stations, not radio (example: Boston Phoenix owning WFNX). I
> wasn't sure if radio was affected in the past.
>
>
More information about the Boston-Radio-Interest
mailing list