The courtship of NBC by the Hearld-Traveler
A. Joseph Ross
joe@attorneyross.com
Tue Jun 23 01:29:21 EDT 2009
On 22 Jun 2009 at 8:31, Kevin Vahey wrote:
> At the bitter end even the FCC wanted to reopen the case but the
> Supreme Court was most likely fed up that the case had dragged for 15
> years and at the time was the longest matter in Federal civil court
> history which now belongs to the Exxon Alaska oil spill.
Since this was largely a partisan battle between the Republican-
oriented Herald Traveler and the Democratic-oriented Globe, I'm not
surprised the FCC wanted to reopen the case. Nixon was in office at
that time, and the Commission had a Republican majority.
> One can 'what if' to death how things would have played out had
> WHDH-TV survived. Most likely the Record-American would have been the
> newspaper that died instead of the H-T. One could surmise that Hearst
> may have ended up with Channel 5 anyways and perhaps the paper as well
> if a waiver could be granted.
Maybe, or maybe not. The Record-American was showing a profit or at
least breaking even. The H-T was already a dying paper being kept
alive by the television profits.
> It never should have happened.
I'll agree with that. The doctrine of greater diversity which was in
vogue at the time was not served by killing off the Herald Traveler.
--
A. Joseph Ross, J.D. 617.367.0468 92
State Street, Suite 700 Fax 617.507.7856
Boston, MA 02109-2004 http://www.attorneyross.com
More information about the Boston-Radio-Interest
mailing list