MLB Network on premium tier?

Kevin Vahey kvahey@comcast.net
Tue Jan 27 12:23:44 EST 2009


It maybe a headend problem.

Cambridge and Chelmsford have it on 269 and in both cases the sports
tier is not bought.



On 1/27/09, Howard Glazer <hmglaz@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> So Comcast (and Time Warner and several other cable titans) owns a share of
> the MLB Network yet is still treating it the same way it treats the NFL
> Network? And Bud Selig is fine with this? I don't get it.
>
> Howard
>
> Maureen Carney <m_carney@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> It (along with NBA TV, NFL Network, NHL Network, Fox Soccer Channel,
> Tennis Channel and some others) is in the sports package and not included
> with standard digital.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Bob Nelson <raccoonradio@gmail.com>
>> To: Howard Glazer <hmglaz@worldnet.att.net>
>> Cc: boston-radio-interest@lists.BostonRadio.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 11:16:33 AM
>> Subject: Re: MLB Network on premium tier?
>>
>> I don't have it either in Beverly. I have expanded basic and I get the
>> "you are not authorized to view this channel" message. A friend in
>> Ohio (with Time-Warner Roadrunner, I think) has it.
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Howard Glazer <hmglaz@worldnet.att.net>
> wrote:
>> > I was visiting family in Swampscott over the weekend. They have
> Comcast's
>> > standard digital package, so I figured I'd check to see whether the MLB
>> > Network had been added yet. It was there (channel 269, I think), but
> what
>> > came up on the screen was the "You are not subscribed" notice
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>


More information about the Boston-Radio-Interest mailing list