What stations still might change Feb 17 anyways.
Bill O'Neill
billohno@gmail.com
Mon Feb 9 14:46:02 EST 2009
Scott Fybush wrote:
> and they believe (probably correctly) that being on UHF is the better
> bet for that purpose.
>
> Clear as mud now?
Questions - How long will it take before stations will decide to
abandon their former channel numbers or will they not need to? It's just
a matter of time when the generations who recall "the old analog days"
will be, alas, proverbial pigs through the python.
Who decides what a new station may use as an alias dial position (or
whatever it's called)? Can a digital station on, say 32, call itself "6"?
Bill O'Neill
More information about the Boston-Radio-Interest
mailing list