Beck's politeness, Smerconish's endorsement

Larry Weil kc1ih@mac.com
Thu Nov 6 15:20:24 EST 2008


> -----Original Message-----
> From: boston-radio-interest-bounces@tsornin.BostonRadio.org 
> [mailto:boston-radio-interest-bounces@tsornin.BostonRadio.org]
>  On Behalf Of Scott Fybush
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 2:06 PM
> To: Bob Nelson
> Cc: BostonRadio Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Beck's politeness, Smerconish's endorsement
> that could be mounted against re-enforcement of the Doctrine.
 
> For what it's worth, incidentally, I'm strongly opposed to 
> the return of the Fairness Doctrine or anything like it. The 
> last thing broadcasting needs now is any further government 
> regulation of content. The FCC does a lousy job already 
> enforcing the few content rules it has (as witness the 
> never-ending court battles over the indecency fines) - the 
> last thing I want is my government wasting my money 
> litigating over something Glenn Beck or Michael Savage said 
> to a few tens or hundreds of thousands of willing listeners 
> last night.
> 

Interesting that you mentioned Beck and Savage but not Keith Olberman or
Rachel Maddow.  I would not want them regulated either.  But I hope there
can be a means, without excessive regulation, to be sure all sides can be
heard.  And it would be nice if things could be mixed up a bit more so that
each side gets heard by people outside of their respective broadcast
ghettos.  And not to be mis-interperted, I am not calling for the government
to intervene, perhaps just hoping for radio and TV utopia.

Larry Weil
Lake Wobegone, NH
 
  



More information about the Boston-Radio-Interest mailing list