Beck's politeness, Smerconish's endorsement
Larry Weil
kc1ih@mac.com
Thu Nov 6 15:20:24 EST 2008
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boston-radio-interest-bounces@tsornin.BostonRadio.org
> [mailto:boston-radio-interest-bounces@tsornin.BostonRadio.org]
> On Behalf Of Scott Fybush
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 2:06 PM
> To: Bob Nelson
> Cc: BostonRadio Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Beck's politeness, Smerconish's endorsement
> that could be mounted against re-enforcement of the Doctrine.
> For what it's worth, incidentally, I'm strongly opposed to
> the return of the Fairness Doctrine or anything like it. The
> last thing broadcasting needs now is any further government
> regulation of content. The FCC does a lousy job already
> enforcing the few content rules it has (as witness the
> never-ending court battles over the indecency fines) - the
> last thing I want is my government wasting my money
> litigating over something Glenn Beck or Michael Savage said
> to a few tens or hundreds of thousands of willing listeners
> last night.
>
Interesting that you mentioned Beck and Savage but not Keith Olberman or
Rachel Maddow. I would not want them regulated either. But I hope there
can be a means, without excessive regulation, to be sure all sides can be
heard. And it would be nice if things could be mixed up a bit more so that
each side gets heard by people outside of their respective broadcast
ghettos. And not to be mis-interperted, I am not calling for the government
to intervene, perhaps just hoping for radio and TV utopia.
Larry Weil
Lake Wobegone, NH
More information about the Boston-Radio-Interest
mailing list