The clout of Bruce Bradley
Donna Halper
dlh@donnahalper.com
Wed Mar 12 21:58:13 EDT 2008
At 08:16 PM 3/12/2008, iraapple wrote:
>Jerry seemed to have greatly embarrassed WBZ management when he debated Avi
>Nelson. I did not hear those debates but I was told that Avi made Jerry
>look extremely bad; that Avi ate his lunch, etc.
Jerry was indeed treated unfairly at WMEX and his numbers were indeed
excellent (I've seen them). And yes, the media coverage of the
debates with Avi Nelson (one of the first televised rightie versus
leftie debates) do gently hint that Avi made the better points. But
Jerry was still very popular so nobody wanted to overtly come out and
insult his performance.
Jerry was self-educated and a populist-- a Lou Dobbs kind of guy, and
sometimes I think he wanted to prove that he could debate anyone,
even people with more education or more expertise, and make them look
foolish. Most of these debates, even the ones on the air, turned out
badly. He had a guy from the KKK on his show in Chicago, and the
media felt he let things really get out of hand... He was very good
with the callers, and we all owe him for having made two-way talk
popular in Boston, but alas, he was often his own worst enemy. I'll
say no more than that.
More information about the Boston-Radio-Interest
mailing list