WEEI 103.7 signal

[Kevin Vahey]

decent day pattern
http://radio-locator.com/cgi-bin/pat?call=WCRN&service=AM&status=L&hours=D

night it does best in outer Metro-West ( which until now was alaways a
black hole for a Red Sox signal )
http://radio-locator.com/cgi-bin/pat?call=WCRN&service=AM&status=L&hours=N

On 7/13/07, Doug Drown <revdoug1@verizon.net> wrote:
> Interesting.  What is WCRN's directional pattern?  When it upped to 50,000
> watts, I thought perhaps we might be able to get the signal up into at least
> south central Maine, but no cigar.  It comes in, but faintly.
>
> -Doug
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Hopfgarten" <paul@derrynh.net>
> To: "'Doug Bassett'" <hinsdalien@yahoo.com>;
> <boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org>
> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 6:13 AM
> Subject: RE: WEEI 103.7 signal
>
>
> > I was driving home via Rte 2 from Albany to Derry NH a couple of weeks
> ago,
> > and I think WCRN has the best "overall" Sox signal. VEI-FM was hash for
> the
> > most part until I came down to Shelburne Falls. The hills are tough on the
> > signal through Savoy, Florida, etc. (About where I lost the Yankees on
> 104.5
> > from Mechanicsville(?)). Now, east of Greenfield, I agree that the 105.5
> > signals starts losing it east of Turners Falls area, and really, WCRN was
> > very strong on 830 even at Turners Falls and was the Sox signal of
> choice..
> >
> > Oh...and club EEI should really pursue 107.7/The Pulse for their NH
> > affiliate.
> >
> > Paul Hopfgarten
> > Derry NH
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: boston-radio-interest-bounces@rolinin.BostonRadio.org
> > [mailto:boston-radio-interest-bounces@rolinin.BostonRadio.org] On Behalf
> Of
> > Doug Bassett
> > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 9:37 PM
> > To: boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
> > Subject: Re: WEEI 103.7 signal
> >
> > --- "A. Joseph Ross" <joe@attorneyross.com> wrote:
> >
> > > WHMP in Northampton was still broadcasting Red Sox
> > > games when I was
> > > out there in mid-May.  But its satellite station in
> > > Springfield was
> > > not.
> >
> > I don't think 1600 was ever a Sox affil., IIRC WHYN
> > 560 was the Sox affil. for Springfield up until
> > recently.  Both 1240 (Greenfield) and 1400
> > (Northampton) have had the Sox for going on forever,
> > and the tradition continues to this day.  I wonder how
> > long Red Sox listeners (and sponsors) will stay with
> > these small AMs, when the games are also aired on the
> > more potent signal of 105.5?
> >
> > Doug Bassett
> > Brattleboro, VT
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> > ________
> > Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect.  Join Yahoo!'s user
> panel
> > and lay it on us.
> > http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
> >
>
>