Standard def reruns aired on HD [was Re: Todd Gross let Go??]
Peter Murray
pete@partnercomm.com
Tue Dec 6 10:56:52 EST 2005
Matthew Osborne wrote:
>Maybe not right now, as HDTV is only in its infancy,
>but down the road I would think so. As more and more
>Americans start getting HDTVs, I can see a demand
>developing for something like this, and someone in the
>industry will eventually figure it out and make good
>money from it. But right now, the vast majority of
>Americans still only have NTSC sets, and as long as
>thats the case its not a feasible business decision
>IMHO.
>
> Matt Osborne
> Schenectady, NY
>
>
<splitting hairs> HDTV is more a toddler than an infant right now
</splitting hairs> but remember, as with any of this
broadcasting/entertainment industry - the consumer is rightfully
technologically agnostic. They care about the cost to them, and care
slightly more about the content. If given the choice between watching a
program that has quality look/sound versus one that is pixelated and
looks terrible, one will likely choose the clearer. Its similar to
choosing between a noisy weaker analog signal versus a full-strength
signal (whether FM, AM, NTSC or ATSC).
Why risk turning off your viewers? It is a very real possibility that
Joe Consumer would defer the purchase of HD reception hardware if he
sees that most of the content out there looks worse with his new $3000 TV...
Of course (pardon my ignorance) - what would it cost to upconvert older
programming (on film) to native HD resolutions? Aren't they often doing
this as programs are re-released to DVD?
-Peter
--
Peter Murray (N3IXY)
Vienna, VA
More information about the Boston-Radio-Interest
mailing list