WGIR 610 AM - unforgivable mistakes during Red Sox broadcasts...
SteveOrdinetz
steveord@bit-net.com
Wed Jun 16 08:27:07 EDT 2004
John J. Francini wrote:
>The past two Red Sox Baseball broadcasts on WGIR-AM 610 Manchester--Sunday
>and tonight-- have been nothing short of a textbook on how not to do a
>network broadcast.
>
>The problems I've heard include:
>
>o Running the broadcast on the 7-second delay used for talk shows, making
>it impossible to use the audio as a substitute for the TV coverage.
I wouldn't necessarily consider this as an error on their part...why should
it matter to them if you want to sync up with tv? Once IBOC happens, get
used to it.
>o Missing the start of local between-inning commercial breaks, and thus
>having 30-60 seconds of dead air. And then adding insult to injury by
>running ALL the local commercials, even though they end up cutting into
>the broadcast by a minute or more.
>
>o Cutting AWAY from the broadcast at 10:00 PM to pick up some sort of
>top-of-the-hour news program from some satellite network, and then the
>start of an hour of Art Bell via satellite, and then finally realizing at
>10:07 that they screwed up royally and returning to the ball game.
>
>o Playing local ads ON TOP OF the game audio.
>
>
>What the hell is going on over there? Is this the sort of scintillating
>production quality you get when Clear Channel buys a station? The fact
>that this has gone on during more than one game means one of two possibilities:
Calm down. First of all Clear Channel (or one of it's predecessors) has
owned this station for at least 10 years. Last I knew they used board ops
for Sox games for this reason...before this year WEEI screwed up so much
that automating a game was hit or miss...they used subaudible tones and it
was not uncommon for their board op to send the wrong ones. Tones also
don't always decode properly either. WEEI started using dedicated relay
closures this year, and problems with automating games have largely
vanished. Maybe because of this WGIR decided to try automating them again.
I don't know how Prophet handles satellite automation...some systems are
better than others, and sports programming can be difficult to automate
because network events don't occur at fixed times like in regular
syndicated programming. It could be that whoever programs the automation
is on vacation this week, and their fill-in isn't totally up to speed on
programming it.
While I agree that this sounds bush league, I don't see the need for this
rant. Whether you like their programming or not, Clear Channel has a rep
for doing a good job from a technical standpoint. Their business # is in
the phone book, why not call and ask for the PD? I'm sure they want to
know if there are problems.
More information about the Boston-Radio-Interest
mailing list