Dem., Kerry lawyers try to squelch anti-Kerry ad
Wayne Carter
wayne@vacationdreams.org
Fri Aug 6 19:20:30 EDT 2004
I am a relative youngster, only 48, so will some of the more
seasoned listers please enlighten me...
Were the broadcast outlets as geared towards specific
"agendas" in the days of Murrow? I had always wished to see
broadcasting news done as news, not with a decided right or left
slant...
Just a question from a mere child...
Wayne Carter
>At 04:39 PM 8/6/2004, Douglas J. Broda wrote:
>
>>If I am true to myself (a basically moderate Democrat who believes
>>that free speech is the heartbeat of America), I must insist that
>>the means for addressing inaccuracies in a political ad is not to
>>squelch speech, but rather to prove its inaccuracy, even if there
>>is a cost to a particular candidate I would badly prefer to see
>>prevail over his opponent.
>
>In theory, that's great. In practice, the media often will not
>cover the rebuttal, so only one side gets heard.
>
>
>--
>Larry Weil
>Lake Wobegone, NH
More information about the Boston-Radio-Interest
mailing list