[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Class A AMs and their owners

To: "Dan Billings" <billings@suscom-maine.net>, <bri@bostonradio.org>
Subject: Re: Class A AMs and their owners
From: Scott Fybush <scott@fybush.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 19:44:37 -0400
In-reply-to: <000c01c3975e$75517ae0$41503f42@yourm3vezyx8af>
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20031020014011.03db4f70@gwind.pair.com>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

At 07:04 PM 10/20/2003 -0400, Dan Billings wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Scott Fybush" <scott@fybush.com>
>To: <bri@bostonradio.org>
>Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 1:56 AM
>Subject: Fwd: Class A AMs and their owners
>
>
> > And so I did...actually, I used the 1968 BY, to give us a nice 35-year
> > span.
>
>OK, now how about the number from sometime in the early 1980's to see what
>has actually changed as a result of a changed regulatory environment.

Name your year - I have 1981, 1983, 1984 and 1985 all on the shelf here. 
I'll tackle it tonight...

s

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Class A AMs and their owners
  - From: "Dan Billings" <billings@suscom-maine.net>

References:
- Fwd: Class A AMs and their owners
  - From: Scott Fybush <scott@fybush.com>
- Re: Class A AMs and their owners
  - From: "Dan Billings" <billings@suscom-maine.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Marshfield cable TV controversy
Next by Date: Re: Class A AMs and their owners
Previous by thread: Re: Class A AMs and their owners
Next by thread: Re: Class A AMs and their owners
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread