[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Non-competes

To: SteveOrdinetz <steveord@bit-net.com>
Subject: Re: Non-competes
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:57:28 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20030923075901.00a76c10@pop3.bit-net.com>
References: <3F6CE61B.5320.7CB291@localhost><200309200058.AA197001442@mail.ttlc.net><5.2.0.9.0.20030922102403.02e99af0@mail.speakeasy.net><5.1.0.14.0.20030923075901.00a76c10@pop3.bit-net.com>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

<<On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 07:59:44 -0400, SteveOrdinetz <steveord@bit-net.com> said:


> Isn't Nexium (sp?) the purple pill?

Prilosec was the old (soon to go off-patent) purple pill; Nexium is
the *new* (more profitable) purple pill.

-GAWollman

References:
- Re: Non-competes
  - From: "A. Joseph Ross" <lawyer@attorneyross.com>
- Re: Non-competes
  - From: "rogerkirk" <rogerkirk@mail.ttlc.net>
- Re: Non-competes
  - From: Aaron Read <aread@speakeasy.net>
- Re: Non-competes
  - From: SteveOrdinetz <steveord@bit-net.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Non-competes
Next by Date: RE: Concept advertising (was Re: Non-competes)
Previous by thread: Re: Non-competes
Next by thread: Re: Non-competes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread