Re: WWZN *Does* Get Out!

[Dan.Strassberg@att.net]

While waiting for your message to open, I was wondering where the reception 
report came from. My guess was Finland. I wasn't far off. WWZN and its 
predecessors have understandably had about the best signals of any US AMs in 
the Scandinavian countries. I would think that WINS might be in second place, 
although I imagine that WINS must have to duke it out with CFRB in far northern 
Europe whereas WWZN is probably pretty much all alone unless there is something 
from Europe or Asia on 1512 or thereabouts. The big joke about 1510 is Finland, 
yes; Weston, no. (You realize that 411 Waverley Oaks Rd is in Waltham--albeit 
eastern Walthem--and that Weston abouts Waltham on the west.)
--
dan.strassberg@att.net
617-558-4205
eFax 707-215-6367
> Who says 1.510-WWZN does'nt go anywhere? 
> In today's "Solar Terrestrial Activity Report" (
> http://www.dxlc.com/solar ),
> Jan Alvestad's MW reception conditions for Norway last night noted:
> 
> > Long distance medium wave (AM) band propagation along
> > east-west paths over high and upper middle latitudes is
> > poor to fair. Propagation along north-south paths is fair.
> > [Trans Atlantic propagation conditions are currently
> > monitored every night on 1470 kHz. Dominant station tonight:
> > Radio Cristal del Uruguay. Several other stations were noted,
> > including at least 2 from Brazil. Overall propagation
> > conditions were unusual with 1510 WWZN Boston heard well at
> > local sunrise along with a few other east coast US stations.
> > At the same time a strong signal from Brazil was observed
> > on 930 kHz.]
> 
>      ~Kaimbridge~
> 
> -----
>     Wanted—Kaimbridge (w/mugshot!):
>            http://www.angelfire.com/ma2/digitology/Wanted_KMGC.html
>       ----------
> Digitology—The Grand Theory Of The Universe:

>            http://www.angelfire.com/ma2/digitology/index.html
> 
>       *****  Void Where Permitted; Limit 0 Per Customer.  *****