[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Old dogs...old tricks

To: "Aaron Read" <aread@speakeasy.net>
Subject: Re: Old dogs...old tricks
From: "Dan Billings" <billings@suscom-maine.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:40:32 -0400
Cc: "Boston Radio" <boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org>
References: <Your message of "Tue, 22 Apr 2003 23:27:41 EDT." <3EA5CFED.29032.34F4D1@localhost> <5.2.0.9.0.20030423112334.02d43990@mail.speakeasy.net> <5.2.0.9.0.20030423125812.01a090f0@mail.speakeasy.net> <5.2.0.9.0.20030423132923.019d3f08@mail.speakeasy.net> <5.2.0.9.0.20030423135147.01a49060@mail.speakeasy.net> <5.2.0.9.0.20030423142224.019bc3e0@mail.speakeasy.net>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

----- Original Message -----
From: "Aaron Read" <aread@speakeasy.net>
To: "Dan Billings" <billings@suscom-maine.net>
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 2:24 PM
Subject: Re: Old dogs...old tricks



> If there were a concentrated nationwide effort...AND if the FCC had the
> staff to go out and make inspections, your theory might work.  But the FCC
> has been gutted by Congress -

Do you have any numbers to back that up?  Has the number of FCC employees
actually been reduced, and if so, from what # to what # today?

References:
- Re: Old dogs...old tricks
  - From: "A. Joseph Ross" <lawyer@attorneyross.com>
- Re: Old dogs...old tricks
  - From: Aaron Read <aread@speakeasy.net>
- Re: Old dogs...old tricks
  - From: Aaron Read <aread@speakeasy.net>
- Re: Old dogs...old tricks
  - From: Aaron Read <aread@speakeasy.net>
- Re: Old dogs...old tricks
  - From: Aaron Read <aread@speakeasy.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Old dogs...old tricks
Next by Date: Re: Old dogs...old tricks
Previous by thread: Re: Old dogs...old tricks
Next by thread: Re: Old dogs...old tricks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread