Re: US Broadcast coverage?

[Dave Faneuf <tklaundry@juno.com>]

On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 21:07:00 -0500 "Dan Billings"
<billings@suscom-maine.net> writes:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave Faneuf" <tklaundry@juno.com>
> To: <billings@suscom-maine.net>
> Cc: <boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org>; <tklaundry@juno.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 7:52 PM
> Subject: Re: US Broadcast coverage?
> 
> 
> > Debate is never a waste of time as you should know.
> 
> Debate is a waste of time when a decision has already been made.
> 
> > always remember when covering any story, there is
> > always more than one side.
> 
> Saddam Hussein's speech was carried live on TV last night.  Every 
> statement
> from the Iraqis is covered here.
> 
> The fact that there is another side of the story doesn't mean it 
> deserves
> coverage.  You don't need to give time to Nazis or those that claim 
> the
> Holocaust didn't happen every time that you do a Holocaust story.
> 
> -- Dan Billings, Bowdoinham, Maine


Guilty until proven guilty?  No debate, no opposing point of view...saves
time
df