RE: Boston Globe (Finally) Weighs In On CCU Liability

["Paul Hopfgarten" <paul@03038.com>]

Simply lawyers using reverse engineering!

Paul Hopfgarten
East Derry NH 03041
paul@03038.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
> [mailto:owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org]On Behalf Of Dan
> Billings
> Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 12:41 PM
> To: lglavin@lycos.com; boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
> Subject: Re: Boston Globe (Finally) Weighs In On CCU Liability
>
>
> I'm not one of those people who runs around beating up trial lawyers, but
> this quote from the Globe story illustrates the problem with our system:
> "Wistow (plaintiff's attorney) said that while he still needs to nail down
> the precise nature of Clear Channel's responsibility, he's all but certain
> to name the company as well."   That's right, find the party with the big
> pockets and then figure out a theory of liability.  The guy's honest, but
> reprehensible.
>
> The Roger Williams law professor quoted in the article agrees with the
> conclusion we reached here.
>
> -- Dan Billings, Bowdoinham, Maine
>
>