[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Church bells

To: "Dave Faneuf" <tklaundry@juno.com>
Subject: Re: Church bells
From: "Dan Billings" <billings@suscom-maine.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2003 22:39:18 -0500
Cc: <boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org>
References: <20030302.195937.-383525.7.tklaundry@juno.com>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Faneuf" <tklaundry@juno.com>
To: <fox893@yahoo.com>
Cc: <billings@suscom-maine.net>; <boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: Church bells

>> Okay, I think you are missing my point.

I got your point.  My point was that even if they had staffed newsrooms,
radio alone in this day and age is not an effective way to reach people.
Especially on weekends.

-- Dan Billings, Bowdoinham, Maine

References:
- Re: Church bells
  - From: Dave Faneuf <tklaundry@juno.com>

Prev by Date: RE: WVMT joins evil empire
Next by Date: Re: BBI a scam? Who knows. (Re: A look back at Bob Bennett)
Previous by thread: Re: Church bells
Next by thread: Re: Church bells
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread