RE: Re:Network News

[Joseph Pappalardo <joepappalardo2001@yahoo.com>]

However, I think these ratings for the networks are
for spot clearance(s) as opposed to programming.

JP

--- Keith Fornal <kfornal@cox.net> wrote:
> Arbitron has the information on their website at
> this link.  It states
> the latest "RADAR" (Radio's All Dimension Audience
> Research) monitors 33
> national networks.
> 
> http://www.arbitron.com/national_radio/radar.htm
> 
> 
> Keith Fornal
> Treasurer
> Dutch Island Lighthouse Society
> www.dutchislandlighthouse.org
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
> [mailto:owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org]
> On Behalf Of Dave
> Faneuf
> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 8:25 PM
> To: aread@speakeasy.net
> Cc: billo@shoreham.net;
> boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
> Subject: Re:Re:Network News
> 
> ---------- Aaron Read <aread@speakeasy.net> writes:
> >I'm not sure I believe those websites there, Dave. 
> Not that I don't 
> >believe the numbers...but what do they mean?   For
> example, a lot of
> >NPR 
> >stations carry a fair amount of NPR programming -
> several hours' >worth
> -over a 24 hour period.   Whereas a station that
> airs a dozen >five
> minute 
> >news updates from CNN each day could be called an
> affiliate...even
> >though 
> >they're only carrying a pittance of programming.
> 
> 
> Dave writes:
> That's why I prefaced my posting with "if you
> believe their websites".
> The thing I found most interesting that I was not
> aware of was the CNN
> mention of Arbitron measuring 31 networks.  Anyone
> have access to those
> numbers?
> df
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


=====
Joe Pappalardo

joepappalardo2001@yahoo.com

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com