[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: CHRISTINA AGUILERA

To: <billo@shoreham.net>
Subject: RE: CHRISTINA AGUILERA
From: "A. Joseph Ross" <lawyer@attorneyross.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 00:31:08 -0500
Cc: "'BRI'" <boston-radio-interest@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
In-reply-to: <MBBBKFAMAGIDMEFAIOMHMENCCKAA.billo@shoreham.net>
Organization: Law Office of A. Joseph Ross, J.D.
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301310952270.9348-100000@gordsven.com>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

On 31 Jan 2003 at 10:20, Bill O'Neill wrote:

> So, prior to tactics that the public media now employ, Aguilera's
> breasts would have been abnormal? Verboten? Do I sense agenda-based
> programming?

I don't think that Christina Aguilera's breasts show in her video.  I'm sure I wouldn't have 
missed it.

-- 
A. Joseph Ross, J.D.                           617.367.0468
 15 Court Square, Suite 210                 lawyer@attorneyross.com
Boston, MA 02108-2503           	         http://www.attorneyross.com

References:
- RE: CHRISTINA AGUILERA
  - From: Sven Franklyn Weil <sven@gordsven.com>
- RE: CHRISTINA AGUILERA
  - From: "Bill O'Neill" <billo@shoreham.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Globe on John Garabedian
Next by Date: Re: Globe on John Garabedian
Previous by thread: RE: CHRISTINA AGUILERA
Next by thread: Re: CHRISTINA AGUILERA
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread