[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: monopoly definition

To: mamros@MIT.EDU, Dave Faneuf <tklaundry@juno.com>
Subject: Re: monopoly definition
From: "A. Joseph Ross" <lawyer@attorneyross.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 00:44:00 -0400
Cc: tklaundry@juno.com, bri@bostonradio.org
In-reply-to: <20021015.130549.-123115257.7.tklaundry@juno.com>
Organization: Law Office of A. Joseph Ross, J.D.
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

On 15 Oct 2002 at 13:05, Dave Faneuf wrote:

> There are markets in MLB with more than one team, owned by different
> entities so why would they be protected under an anti-trust exemption
> since there is not a monopoly in that particular city?  

There may be more than one team in the market, and they may have different owners, but 
they all belong to the same cartel, namely Major-League Baseball.  Teams can't be sold or 
move without MLB approval, and they all follow the same set of rules.

-- 
A. Joseph Ross, J.D.                           617.367.0468
 15 Court Square, Suite 210                 lawyer@attorneyross.com
Boston, MA 02108-2503           	         http://www.attorneyross.com

References:
- Re: monopoly definition
  - From: Dave Faneuf <tklaundry@juno.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Rant @ Globe: WODS' 15 years of oldies
Next by Date: Re: monopoly definition
Previous by thread: Re: monopoly definition
Next by thread: Re: monopoly definition
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread