[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Dead Carrier (was: Lightning KOs "The River" Temporarily / WERS)

To: billo@shoreham.net, "Aaron \[Bishop\] Read" <aread@speakeasy.net>, boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
Subject: Re: Dead Carrier (was: Lightning KOs "The River" Temporarily / WERS)
From: Dan Billings <billingsdan@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 15:36:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-reply-to: <MBBBKFAMAGIDMEFAIOMHMENCCFAA.billo@shoreham.net>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

--- Bill O'Neill <billo@shoreham.net> wrote:
> Is that point defines/spelled out?  Or is that what
> is being assumed by operators?

I think the point is assumed but Aaron's logic is
sound.  If there is not a rule prohibiting the
broadcasting of dead air, and you meet all the other
requirements, the station is operating legally.

-- Dan Billings, Bowdoinham, Maine

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
http://autos.yahoo.com

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Dead Carrier (was: Lightning KOs "The River" Temporarily / WERS)
  - From: "Bill O'Neill" <billo@shoreham.net>

References:
- Dead Carrier (was: Lightning KOs "The River" Temporarily / WERS)
  - From: "Bill O'Neill" <billo@shoreham.net>

Prev by Date: RE: Doc Laura/C-Net
Next by Date: STAR 93.7 no audio?
Previous by thread: Dead Carrier (was: Lightning KOs "The River" Temporarily / WERS)
Next by thread: RE: Dead Carrier (was: Lightning KOs "The River" Temporarily / WERS)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread