[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Glen Beck and Tom Leykus (sp?)

To: "Dan Billings" <dib9@gwi.net>, <boston-radio-interest@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Glen Beck and Tom Leykus (sp?)
From: "Joseph Pappalardo" <joepappalardo2001@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 03:52:19 -0500
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10112111033410.13697-100000@home.gordsven.com> <3.0.3.32.20011211223741.006f99c8@user.xtdl.com> <001b01c182c3$576d50a0$b62692ac@default>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org


> I still can't believe someone thought it was a good idea to replace Gene
> Burns with Leykis.

Ah, yes....gotta go for that lowest-common denominator talk!  

Young and dumb beats intelligence anyday with PD's and consultants...

JP



_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

References:
- Re: Quack medicine hour on WBZ (AM)
  - From: Sven Franklyn Weil <sven@gordsven.com>
- Re: Glen Beck and Tom Leykus (sp?)
  - From: SteveOrdinetz <steveord@wavewizard.com>
- Re: Glen Beck and Tom Leykus (sp?)
  - From: "Dan Billings" <dib9@gwi.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Glen Beck and WGIR
Next by Date: Re: WODS Observations
Previous by thread: Re: Glen Beck and Tom Leykus (sp?)
Next by thread: RE: Glen Beck and Tom Leykus (sp?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread