[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: WBPS Finally goes CNET

To: "Norm Rosen" <inorm99@earthlink.net>, "Hakim Madjid" <HMadjid@mindspring.com>
Subject: RE: WBPS Finally goes CNET
From: "Hakim Madjid" <HMadjid@mindspring.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 14:24:38 -0500
Cc: "Sven Franklyn Weil" <sven@gordsven.com>, "Cooper Fox" <fox893@yahoo.com>, <boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org>
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <3C0A780F.58F7ECF9@earthlink.net>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org


>bauds per second?

I just meant from a technical standpoint, in a data communication system,
that the baud rate and the data transmision rate [bits per second] are *NOT*
necessarily equivalent.

73, de Hakim (N1ZFF)

References:
- Re: WBPS Finally goes CNET
  - From: Norm Rosen <inorm99@earthlink.net>

Prev by Date: Re: News Story
Next by Date: Re: WBPS Finally goes CNET
Previous by thread: Re: WBPS Finally goes CNET
Next by thread: Re: WBPS Finally goes CNET
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread