[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Low UHF channels



On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, Garrett Wollman wrote:

> <<On Mon, 05 Nov 2001 15:06:47 -0500, "Eli Polonsky" <elipolonsky@hotmail.com> said:
> 
> 11 in Durham and 26 in Biddeford providing all necessary coverage.
> Channels 14 (Worcester), 16 (Providence), and 17 (Portsmouth) are now
> allocated to the land mobile service, and I think the FCC considers

Is this just applicable to the Boston metro area or is this a standard
thing?  I'm curious because TV sets still tune in Channel 14, 15, 16, 17,
etc.
  P.S. Channel 17 is a Korean-language station here in NYC.  And in
Philly, Channel 17 is a repeater for one of the national stations, I
think.


-- 
Sven Franklyn Weil            "The needs of the many outweigh 
<sven@gordsven.com>                      the needs of the few
<http://www.gordsven.com/sven>                   or the one." 
                                                     -- Surak