[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Rush (was a header that Bill didn't like)

To: "Dan Billings" <dib9@gwi.net>
Subject: Rush (was a header that Bill didn't like)
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 15:36:37 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: <boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org>
In-Reply-To: <004101c125c0$9b73f160$8391c3d8@default>
References: <004101c125c0$9b73f160$8391c3d8@default>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

<<On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 15:29:29 -0400, "Dan Billings" <dib9@gwi.net> said:

> We are talking about commercial radio and quality is judged by commercial
> success.

...in inverse proportion.

-GAWollman

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rush (was a header that Bill didn't like)
  - From: "Dan Billings" <dib9@gwi.net>

References:
- Rush (was a header that Bill didn't like)
  - From: "Dan Billings" <dib9@gwi.net>
- Rush (was a header that Bill didn't like)
  - From: "Dan Billings" <dib9@gwi.net>

Prev by Date: Rush (was a header that Bill didn't like)
Next by Date: Nice Header (was: Rush (was a header that Bill didn't like))
Previous by thread: Rush (was a header that Bill didn't like)
Next by thread: Re: Rush (was a header that Bill didn't like)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread