[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Telecommunications Act (Lack of) Coverage

To: Jibguy@aol.com
Subject: Re: Telecommunications Act (Lack of) Coverage
From: Sven Franklyn Weil <sven@gordsven.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 11:02:06 -0400 (EDT)
cc: mamros@MIT.EDU, wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu, boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
In-Reply-To: <9d.14cde38b.282380e5@aol.com>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

On Thu, 3 May 2001 Jibguy@aol.com wrote:
> They HAD to.   Losing too much money....    part of the design of TelCom96.
> ---jibguy
> 

How can a one-station guy like Bob survive when Randy Michaels is selling
ads that are sometimes at rates like "8 station for the price of one."

All monopolies try to cut the throats of their competitors. THen when the
competition is gone, the monopolist jacks up the price because he is the
only game in town.

Sven F. Weil
email: sven@chookus.com
WWW homepage:  http://home.gordsven.com/gordsven/sven
RadioLand Site:  http://home.gordsven.com/gordsven/sven/radiomuseum.html

References:
- Re: Telecommunications Act (Lack of) Coverage
  - From: Jibguy@aol.com

Prev by Date: RE: 89.3 pirate goes ID-crazy
Next by Date: Re: Telecommunications Act (Lack of) Coverage
Previous by thread: Re: Telecommunications Act (Lack of) Coverage
Next by thread: Re: Telecommunications Act (Lack of) Coverage
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread