[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: Boston radio now-- or rather, Clear Channel radio now

To: hopfgapr@sprynet.com
Subject: Re: Re: Boston radio now-- or rather, Clear Channel radio now
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 12:59:26 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: boston-radio-interest@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Springmail.105.988714542.0.96136000@www.springmail.com>
References: <Springmail.105.988714542.0.96136000@www.springmail.com>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

<<On Tue, 01 May 2001 06:55:42 -0400, hopfgapr@sprynet.com said:

> Listen, I thought Politics were verboten here! Or is it only
> Conservative Politics that's not allowed.....

I think it is entirely legitimate to consider what effect the new
administration will have on broadcasting regulation.  However, I would
agree that posters should make an effort to do so in a reasoned,
polite manner for the benefit of all readers.

-GAWollman

References:
- Re: Re: Boston radio now-- or rather, Clear Channel radio now
  - From: hopfgapr@sprynet.com
- Re: Re: Boston radio now-- or rather, Clear Channel radio now
  - From: hopfgapr@sprynet.com

Prev by Date: Re: Nationals?
Next by Date: Re: How The Industry Has Slipped
Previous by thread: Re: Re: Boston radio now-- or rather, Clear Channel radio now
Next by thread: Re: Re: Boston radio now-- or rather, Clear Channel radio now
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread