Re: 1510 at night?

[Norm Rosen <inorm99@earthlink.net>]

"Martin J. Waters" wrote:

> >Chuck Igo wrote:
> >
> >   i was actually wondering the same thing myself last night on the ride down
> >from Maine.  all the way down 95, 1510 was blastin' in.
>
>         IIRC, the 1510 assignment somewhere roughly due north in Quebec has
> been silent for years. WNRB also has benefited from elimination of the
> interference since WNLC in New London was deleted a year or two ago. It's a
> very clear channel nowadays. There's a 1kW night in Syracuse (if the CP for
> a frequency change listed in my 1998 list is on), a 230-watt in NJ, WLAC,
> and then the next nearest stations at night are 1.3 kW or less in Texas,
> Colorado, and Puerto Rico. As always, WNRB's biggest problem is that WTOP
> and WWKB pound in so big that it gets splash interference very close in.

WNRB has I guess, until recently had a strong null to the SW to protect WLAC, and
WNLC.

With WNLC deleted in 1998, there was some talk of  WNRB's night pattern being
allowed to

serve metro west Boston better with a stonger signal.

Has there been any changes in WNRB's pattern since a couple of years ago?