[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 1510 at night?
"Martin J. Waters" wrote:
> >Chuck Igo wrote:
> > i was actually wondering the same thing myself last night on the ride down
> >from Maine. all the way down 95, 1510 was blastin' in.
> IIRC, the 1510 assignment somewhere roughly due north in Quebec has
> been silent for years. WNRB also has benefited from elimination of the
> interference since WNLC in New London was deleted a year or two ago. It's a
> very clear channel nowadays. There's a 1kW night in Syracuse (if the CP for
> a frequency change listed in my 1998 list is on), a 230-watt in NJ, WLAC,
> and then the next nearest stations at night are 1.3 kW or less in Texas,
> Colorado, and Puerto Rico. As always, WNRB's biggest problem is that WTOP
> and WWKB pound in so big that it gets splash interference very close in.
WNRB has I guess, until recently had a strong null to the SW to protect WLAC, and
With WNLC deleted in 1998, there was some talk of WNRB's night pattern being
serve metro west Boston better with a stonger signal.
Has there been any changes in WNRB's pattern since a couple of years ago?