Re: WCAX/WVMT vs. WSYB

[nuhuc@juno.com]

On Tue, 29 Aug 2000 20:04:35 -0400 SteveOrdinetz
<steveord@wavewizard.com> writes:

> I always thought of WSYB as being the "successful" Rutland AM.  
> Didn't WHWB
> go dark for a while, then come back only to go dark again?  If I'm 
> not
> mistaken WHWB made a frequency switch sometime in the late 70s/early 
> 80s,
> from 1000 to 990, though remaining a 1kW daytimer.  Not sure of the 
> reason
> for the change.

And it seemed to me that in the early/mid seventies, back when I was
working in Springfield, VT that "HB" was a rocker.  That frequency shift
was wierd... they must have had some night time power, no?

Of course, the WHWB-FM signal was even more legendary, 42,000 watts at
300 feet below sea level, or something like that.

-Kelly

________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.