[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: What about the old AM 600 & 850 freqs?(was: All-News Failing Miserably in Montreal)

To: "'boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org'" <boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org>
Subject: RE: What about the old AM 600 & 850 freqs?(was: All-News Failing Miserably in Montreal)
From: EM1 GITCHIER <RGITSCHIER@doyle.navy.mil>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 05:46:34 -0400
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

Kevin, List, 

Assuming they're nondirectional signals, I'd certainly favor something like
600AM, gotta have a nice reach watt for watt, tower wavelegnth for tower
wavelegnth compared to say, 1200 and lower.... especially. 

Ron Gitschier
Ex: Lowell, MA
Temporarily: Aruba

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Kevin Vahey [SMTP:kvahey@mediaone.net]
>  Subject:	Re: What about the old AM 600 & 850 freqs?(was: All-News
> Failing 	Miserably in Montreal)
> 
> 
> Somehow I think the CRTC night take a dim view on that.... :)
> 
> I can't see anyone breaking down the doors for the 600
> assignment.......850
> however should go easily.
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What about the old AM 600 & 850 freqs?(was: All-News Failing Miserably in Montreal)
  - From: "Kevin Vahey" <kvahey@mediaone.net>

Prev by Date: Larry Glick return to Boston radio on a regular basis
Next by Date: Re: What about the old AM 600 & 850 freqs?(was: All-News Failing Miserably in Montreal)
Previous by thread: Larry Glick return to Boston radio on a regular basis
Next by thread: Re: What about the old AM 600 & 850 freqs?(was: All-News Failing Miserably in Montreal)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread