[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: LPFM vs NAB

To: "'Douglas J. Broda'" <djbroda@mindspring.com>
Subject: RE: LPFM vs NAB
From: "me" <gff@mediaone.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:52:55 -0500
Cc: "Boston Radio Mail List (E-mail)" <boston-radio-interest@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <200001210618.BAA16123@smtp6.mindspring.com>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

Just check the U.S. Trademark & Patents office site - there is no
registration for "Yankee Network" so we could call it that!

-g.f.


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
[mailto:owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org]On Behalf Of Douglas
J. Broda
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2000 1:20 AM
To: Jibguy@aol.com; boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
Subject: Re: LPFM vs NAB


How about a non-profit foundation to syndicate LTAR to low-power stations
across New England? We could call it the "Yankee Network." (Only kidding...
I think.)

Follow-Ups:
- RE: LPFM vs NAB
  - From: "Douglas J. Broda" <djbroda@mindspring.com>

References:
- Re: LPFM vs NAB
  - From: "Douglas J. Broda" <djbroda@mindspring.com>

Prev by Date: Re: LPFM and translators
Next by Date: RE: LPFM vs NAB
Previous by thread: Re: LPFM vs NAB
Next by thread: RE: LPFM vs NAB
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread