[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WSRO (CJMS-1280)

To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: WSRO (CJMS-1280)
From: Sven Weil <sven@lily.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 12:16:02 -0400 (EWT)
cc: boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
In-Reply-To: <199910151518.LAA31164@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org


Couldn't they have just sold the station instead? or instead, to prevent
competion, did they just pull the plug on CJMS?

--
Sven F. Weil
e-mail: sven@lily.org
World Wide Web: http://www.lily.org/~sven


On Fri, 15 Oct 1999, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> Here's the scoop....
> 
> The same could not be done with the news-talk format, for obvious
> reasons.  As a result, whichever of the two stations had the weaker
> signal was shut down in each of the duopoly markets.  The owners of
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: WSRO (CJMS-1280)
  - From: Garrett Wollman <wollman>

References:
- Re: WSRO (CJMS-1280)
  - From: Garrett Wollman <wollman>

Prev by Date: Re: WSRO (CJMS-1280)
Next by Date: Re: WSRO (CJMS-1280)
Previous by thread: Re: WSRO (CJMS-1280)
Next by thread: Re: WSRO (CJMS-1280)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread