[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: a satellite question-- exclusivity?
- Subject: Re: a satellite question-- exclusivity?
- From: "Douglas J. Broda" <dougbroda@mindspring.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 Sep 1998 18:35:44 -0400
At 08:23 AM 9/3/98 -0400, Shawn Mamros wrote:
>I think we're talking two different situations here. In the latter
>example, ABC provides a feed to one *station* - one affiliate - per
>market. You're not going to see channel 4 or 7 sending out ABC's
>programming in Boston.
>
>But in the former situation, it's one network providing a feed to
>*other networks*. There are no CBC affiliates in Boston. :-) We're
>also talking about two different media to some extent - cable (CNN) vs.
>broadcast (NBC) networks. If the CBC has agreements with both CNN and
>NBC, that's their business.
>
My recollection -- fuzzy, I admit -- is that CBC doesn't grant its footage
exclusively. I seem to recall that BBC similarly provided feed re Diana's
funeral to more than one source.
>And, when it comes to getting news footage of an event in Canada, are
>there any other choices besides the CBC? That may also be a factor in
>such situations - if there's only one source for feeds or actualities in
>a given location, all the US networks, cable and broadcast, that do news
>are going to have the same footage. Seems to be pretty common practice
>on the nightly newscasts, actually...
There is another news source in Canada.... CTV (which also operates
Canada's equivalent of Headline News, whereas CBC runs Newsworld, the rough
equivalent of CNN).
------------------------------