[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Beat reporters...
- From: ASchinella <ASchinella@aol.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 02:17:49 EDT
Very good comments Dan. I have realized by being on both sides of the
reporting; trying to get the story and trying to be covered that the only
successful outlets who get the story well are those who make a commitment to
have a beat reporter on the job. If times are tough for a station, which on
the smaller ones it is, figure out ways of balancing the features so that
reporters still make the relationship with the newsmakers and the story gets
told to the viewers or listerners who want to watch or hear it.
In a message dated 5/13/98 5:56:05 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Dib9@aol.com
<< Much of the problem with poor news coverage is management putting
in positions that they should not be in. The Portland TV stations do a
horrible job covering state government because, for the most part, they do
assign a reporter to the State House as a beat, they just send whoever is
available to cover a story. Any State House is a complicated place and if
do not know the people and the process, you can not do a good job covering
This year WCSH had a reporter doing a live shot at 6 before the Governor's
State of the State address and a loud bell went off. The reporter, not
knowing that the bell was a bell that goes off any time there is a Roll Call
vote, said "There must be a fire drill." She obviously had never been at the
State House when the Legislature was in session, but there she was doing a
live stand up covering the State House.
As a political junkie and someone who has been involved in the process for
years, I get much more upset by factual errors and simple misreporting of how
the process works than I do about mispronunciations. In my time in radio, I
have certainly screwed up more than my share of pronunciations, sometimes
when I know the correct pronunciation.
Bowdoinham, Maine >>