[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: WSRO sold
- Subject: Re: WSRO sold
- From: WhomFAN <WhomFAN@aol.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 16:56:43 EDT
In a message dated 98-04-17 15:10:25 EDT, ASchinella@aol.com writes:
>
> While it is true some right-wingers reign on talk radio, and more left-of-
> center types are never given enough chances to speak, never mind to shine,
> the
> spin is more corporate than conservative. Everything has the big business,
> corporate spin to it and if you don't tow that line; whether from the left
> or
> the right, you won't get on the air with the big companies or syndicators.
>
> A perfect example is Jim Hightower. When Hightower had his weekend show
> syndicated by ABC, WRKO would never put him on. To their credit, WRKO had
> local weekend programming, even if it was hard right-wingers like Chuck
> Adler,
> Janeen Graf and Mike Wiley (both, out of work local hosts who could be
added
> to that list I posted a few weeks ago) and later the Two Twits. Even one of
> the Boston Globe editorialists, who happened to hear Hightower's show while
> vacationing on the Cape, called on WRKO to put him on the air in Boston! (
> How
> often does something like THAT happen? Especially from the Globe who have a
> special hatred for the format, unless you are Chris Lydon, of course.) Yet,
> surprisingly, when Hightower was fired, and replaced by business-friendly,
> liberal, Bernie Ward, WRKO put him on, canning those local hosts or
shifting
> them around to fill-in slots.
>
> Personally, I don't like NPR and don't count it in the same respects as
> commercial talk radio. Maybe that is a flaw on my part. Commercial radio
has
> to play by the forces of the dreaded market whereas NPR do not. And
whenever
> I
> listen to NPR, with the exception of Lydon who I find interesting most of
> the
> time, the spin is very safe and unchallenging to those dominant corporate
> powers who own everything in media. WBUR doesn't take any chances, which
> they
> should because they are in the position to, yet they are beholden to their
> corporate interests who continue to fund their drives. I mean, come on...
> Lydon does a show on expansion of NAFTA last year and invites on Ira
Jackson
> of BankBoston; a major campaign and NPR contributor, a major global player
> who
> could give a damn about displaced America workers or enslaved Chilean
> workers,
> with direct monetary interests concerning the policy, and he is on for a
> whole
> hour almost unchecked. It is disgraceful.
>
> To WRPT's credit, they do have local hosts now (with a conservative/pro-
> business spin), which they didn't when they first started, for most of the
> day. Don Feder, Dr. Lori Roth and John Napolitano (sp?) are all broacast
> from
> WRPT's studios. I don't know if they lease the time or they are hired, but
> they are local, which is a positive thing, I think.
>
> There are so many other examples there are too many to mention. Needless to
> say, it is a very sad state of affairs when one of the most liberal,
> progressive, whatever, state in the United States has no opportunity to
> compete. It is discrimination by opinion and it is wrong.
>
> Just my $2.00, Tony
>
I agree.......It is not a left or right wing media/press it is a corporate
press looking out for
themselfs... With some help from the great telecom reform "act" of 1995...
my $.02....GOOD DAY
------------------------------