Re: Stations that do suck

[Your Real Name <vortec@channel1.com>]

At 04:23 PM 4/8/98 -0400, you wrote:

>>I think there must have been a typo in the magazine. Perhaps is
>>should've read: "Stations that DO SUCK".

AMEN.

>Considering the target audience of Rolling Stone, the above-list is a
>natural assumption.  You think a sex, drugs, and rock n' roll mag is gonna
>give a news-talk, sports, Top 40 oldies, country, or "God-forbid", a
>Christian station a good mark? (shel)

Yes, yes, yes, but it's still highly argueable that even judged within the
catagories of "sex, drugs, and rock n' roll" that the listed stations still
pretty much.... well, suck.  


Vincent@
Vortec Communications

------------------------------