Re: Clear Signals

["supersport@eb101.com" <supersport@cybercom.net>]

>Date: Tue, 27 May 1997 00:43:50 -0400
>To: >From: "supersport@eb101.com" <supersport@eb101.com>
>Subject: Re: Clear Signals
>
>I agree with Bob.  I remember many folks listening to 1150 WACQ, including
myself.  And I hated the horrible night time signal they had in Boston.
But because they were not afraid to play "below the Top 40" hits and blend
it with long versions, great jingle packages, oldies and personality
jocks...I tuned in!  Outside of "average" there are still a lot of
listeners!!!  BTW, I did the same for WGTR and 550 AM out of RI, I forget
the calls at the time.
>
>Now playing... Jackie Onasis by the Human Sexual Response (EB101)
>
>
>SS
>
>
>At 11:11 PM 5/26/97 -0400, you wrote:
>>In a message dated 97-05-25 09:59:41 EDT, wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu
>>(Garrett Wollman) writes:
>>
>>>  The average
>>>person is so accustomed to crystal-clear signals that if a signal is
>>>noticeably impaired, she will consider it the same as ``you can't get
>>>it''.
>>
>>I think Garrett is 80% correct.  80% of the people out there will do as he
>>says, as 80% of the public are unadventurous idiots.  However, perhaps 20%
>>WILL explore and listen to what they want regardless of the signal.   At
>>WJIB, we have a lot of those 20%-ers.    250 big ones get heard by many
>>loyals out there.
>>
>>----jibguy
>>
>>

------------------------------