[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Legal ID's and the FCC....
- Subject: Legal ID's and the FCC....
- From: D7695@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 27 Apr 1997 02:13:03 -0400 (EDT)
<<
True. And I do think the FCC *used* to enforce this point. In the '80s,
WSNE
Taunton-Providence used to do a similar thing, IDing with a jungle of "93.3,
WSNE <Taunton> Providence!" The word "Taunton" was spoken quietly and
quickly
between the sung calls and the sung word "Providence." They'd been using it
for
a long time, then suddenly went to the jocks doing live IDs (with no other
programming/liner/etc. changes). I was never able to verify it, but the
consensus was that they got dinged for it.
<<
I think the case studiy was WGNG.....which was liscenced to PA-TUCK-ET, Rhode
Island....next door to Providence...Had a great signal for 500(?) watts at
550AM.
They were trying to compete with Providence stations....
And had a sung ID:
"W-G-N-G! <barely audible:"pawtucket"> RHODE ISLANDDDDD!"
They were definitely cited for this.
RE: The WROR ID...Let's face it! ....the FCC doesn't care anymore....While it
rates high with you and me....It's definitely off their radar screens at the
moment...
------------------------------