From 011010001@interpring.com Fri Sep 1 08:54:58 2017 From: 011010001@interpring.com (Rob Landry) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 08:54:58 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Brazilian pirate on 103.1 Message-ID: There's a Brazilian pirate caling itself "Radio Arena" operating from Natick on 103.1. He probably isn't running more than 50 watts, and his antenna is on a rooftop in Natick Center. He does interfere with WODS reception in the Natic Center area, but not beyond a couple block radius of his antenna. Rob From raccoonradio@gmail.com Sat Sep 9 20:07:36 2017 From: raccoonradio@gmail.com (Bob Nelson) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2017 20:07:36 -0400 Subject: Donna Halper on WMWM Message-ID: Auntie Donna on WMWM today with me, Aaron, and Ronnie on What's Happening. About 1 hr 40 min long *http://raccoonradio.freehostia.com/Aaron/Halper17Sep9.mp3 * From joe@attorneyross.com Sun Sep 10 00:54:34 2017 From: joe@attorneyross.com (A Joseph Ross) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 00:54:34 -0400 Subject: WJIB's FM signal towards Dedham Message-ID: <65d1d4ec-a42b-92fe-a186-f72ab413d837@attorneyross.com> I drove down to Dedham today and turned on 101.3 to see how the signal was.? While I was still on VFW Parkway in South Boston, WMRC started interfering, and by the time I crossed Bridge Street/Spring Street, I was hearing WMRC more than WJIB.? WJIB came back from time to time as I drove down to Stop & Shop, which was my destination, but I'd say the WJIB translator doesn't quite reach that part of Boston, at least while driving.? In a home FM radio, where the antenna can be aimed and stay in position, it may still be listenable. -- A. Joseph Ross, J.D. | 1340 Centre Street, Suite 103 | Newton, MA 02459 617.367.0468 | Fx:617.507.7856 | http://www.attorneyross.com From dave@skywaves.net Tue Sep 12 15:23:11 2017 From: dave@skywaves.net (Dave Doherty) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 15:23:11 -0400 Subject: The FCC Enforcement Bureau Has Been Busy... Message-ID: <005701d32bfc$93088b40$b919a1c0$@skywaves.net> >From today's FCC Public Notice: RICHARD CLOUDEN; BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS. Notice of unlicensed operation issued for FM station operating on frequency 101.3 MHz in Boston, Massachusetts. Action by: Regional Director, Region One, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 09/11/2017 by Notice. EB https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346669A1.docx https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346669A1.pdf QUINTON JOSEPH; DORCHESTER, MASSACHUSETTS. Notice of unlicensed operation issued for FM station operating on frequency 105.3 MHz in Dorchester, Massachusetts. Action by: Regional Director, Region One, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 09/11/2017 by Notice. EB https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346668A1.docx https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346668A1.pdf TALYA ANDREA LANTZ; BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS. Notice of unlicensed operation issued for FM station operating on frequency 101.3 MHz in Boston, Massachusetts. Action by: Regional Director, Region One, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 09/11/2017 by Notice. EB https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346670A1.docx https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346670A1.pdf YVON GRANDCHAMPS; MATTAPAN, MASSACHUSETTS. Notice of unlicensed operation issued for FM station operating on frequency 104.7 in Mattapan, Massachusetts. Action by: Regional Director, Region One, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 09/11/2017 by Notice. EB https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346671A1.docx https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346671A1.pdf MICHELLE JOSEPH; DORCHESTER, MASSACHUSETTS. Notice of unlicensed operation issued for FM station operating on frequency 105.3 MHz in Dorchester, Massachusetts. Action by: Regional Director, Region One, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 09/11/2017 by Notice. EB https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346667A1.docx https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346667A1.pdf From joe@attorneyross.com Tue Sep 12 17:32:52 2017 From: joe@attorneyross.com (A. Joseph Ross) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:32:52 -0400 Subject: The FCC Enforcement Bureau Has Been Busy... In-Reply-To: <005701d32bfc$93088b40$b919a1c0$@skywaves.net> References: <005701d32bfc$93088b40$b919a1c0$@skywaves.net> Message-ID: Two different people operating on 101.3 and two on 105.3? Dorchester sure is a busy place! On 9/12/2017 3:23 PM, Dave Doherty wrote: > >From today's FCC Public Notice: > > RICHARD CLOUDEN; BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS. Notice of unlicensed operation issued for FM station operating on frequency 101.3 MHz in Boston, Massachusetts. Action by: Regional Director, Region One, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 09/11/2017 by Notice. EB https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346669A1.docx > https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346669A1.pdf > > > QUINTON JOSEPH; DORCHESTER, MASSACHUSETTS. Notice of unlicensed operation issued for FM station operating on frequency 105.3 MHz in Dorchester, Massachusetts. Action by: Regional Director, Region One, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 09/11/2017 by Notice. EB https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346668A1.docx > https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346668A1.pdf > > > TALYA ANDREA LANTZ; BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS. Notice of unlicensed operation issued for FM station operating on frequency 101.3 MHz in Boston, Massachusetts. Action by: Regional Director, Region One, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 09/11/2017 by Notice. EB https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346670A1.docx > https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346670A1.pdf > > > YVON GRANDCHAMPS; MATTAPAN, MASSACHUSETTS. Notice of unlicensed operation issued for FM station operating on frequency 104.7 in Mattapan, Massachusetts. Action by: Regional Director, Region One, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 09/11/2017 by Notice. EB https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346671A1.docx > https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346671A1.pdf > > > MICHELLE JOSEPH; DORCHESTER, MASSACHUSETTS. Notice of unlicensed operation issued for FM station operating on frequency 105.3 MHz in Dorchester, Massachusetts. Action by: Regional Director, Region One, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 09/11/2017 by Notice. EB https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346667A1.docx > https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346667A1.pdf > > > > > -- A. Joseph Ross, J.D. | 1340 Centre Street, Suite 103 |Newton, MA 02459-2004 617.367.0468| Fx: 617.507.7856 | http://www.attorneyross.com From rogerkirk@ttlc.net Tue Sep 12 18:30:19 2017 From: rogerkirk@ttlc.net (Roger Kirk) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 18:30:19 -0400 Subject: The FCC Enforcement Bureau Has Been Busy... In-Reply-To: <005701d32bfc$93088b40$b919a1c0$@skywaves.net> References: <005701d32bfc$93088b40$b919a1c0$@skywaves.net> Message-ID: Seems 105.3 is a fave. On 9/12/2017 3:23 PM, Dave Doherty wrote: > >From today's FCC Public Notice: > > RICHARD CLOUDEN; BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS. Notice of unlicensed operation issued for FM station operating on frequency 101.3 MHz in Boston, Massachusetts. Action by: Regional Director, Region One, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 09/11/2017 by Notice. EB https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346669A1.docx > https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346669A1.pdf > > > QUINTON JOSEPH; DORCHESTER, MASSACHUSETTS. Notice of unlicensed operation issued for FM station operating on frequency 105.3 MHz in Dorchester, Massachusetts. Action by: Regional Director, Region One, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 09/11/2017 by Notice. EB https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346668A1.docx > https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346668A1.pdf > > > TALYA ANDREA LANTZ; BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS. Notice of unlicensed operation issued for FM station operating on frequency 101.3 MHz in Boston, Massachusetts. Action by: Regional Director, Region One, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 09/11/2017 by Notice. EB https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346670A1.docx > https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346670A1.pdf > > > YVON GRANDCHAMPS; MATTAPAN, MASSACHUSETTS. Notice of unlicensed operation issued for FM station operating on frequency 104.7 in Mattapan, Massachusetts. Action by: Regional Director, Region One, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 09/11/2017 by Notice. EB https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346671A1.docx > https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346671A1.pdf > > > MICHELLE JOSEPH; DORCHESTER, MASSACHUSETTS. Notice of unlicensed operation issued for FM station operating on frequency 105.3 MHz in Dorchester, Massachusetts. Action by: Regional Director, Region One, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 09/11/2017 by Notice. EB https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346667A1.docx > https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346667A1.pdf > > > > > > From jjlehmann@comcast.net Tue Sep 12 21:00:10 2017 From: jjlehmann@comcast.net (Jeff Lehmann) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 21:00:10 -0400 Subject: The FCC Enforcement Bureau Has Been Busy... In-Reply-To: References: <005701d32bfc$93088b40$b919a1c0$@skywaves.net> Message-ID: <035101d32c2b$a6adcbe0$f40963a0$@comcast.net> No, just two different notices for each one. 101.3 (now 100.3), 105.3, and 87.7 are all at the same location. Jeff Lehmann From joe@attorneyross.com Wed Sep 13 00:11:51 2017 From: joe@attorneyross.com (A Joseph Ross) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:11:51 -0400 Subject: The FCC Enforcement Bureau Has Been Busy... In-Reply-To: <035101d32c2b$a6adcbe0$f40963a0$@comcast.net> References: <005701d32bfc$93088b40$b919a1c0$@skywaves.net> <035101d32c2b$a6adcbe0$f40963a0$@comcast.net> Message-ID: <46268610-004f-fa2f-a45c-218926839ffe@attorneyross.com> But there are different individual names on the notice.? I guess there are more than one person running the station. On 9/12/2017 9:00 PM, Jeff Lehmann wrote: > No, just two different notices for each one. 101.3 (now 100.3), 105.3, and 87.7 are all at the same location. > > Jeff Lehmann > > -- A. Joseph Ross, J.D. | 1340 Centre Street, Suite 103 | Newton, MA 02459 617.367.0468 | Fx:617.507.7856 | http://www.attorneyross.com From kvahey@gmail.com Wed Sep 13 03:55:38 2017 From: kvahey@gmail.com (Kevin Vahey) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 03:55:38 -0400 Subject: The FCC Enforcement Bureau Has Been Busy... In-Reply-To: <46268610-004f-fa2f-a45c-218926839ffe@attorneyross.com> References: <005701d32bfc$93088b40$b919a1c0$@skywaves.net> <035101d32c2b$a6adcbe0$f40963a0$@comcast.net> <46268610-004f-fa2f-a45c-218926839ffe@attorneyross.com> Message-ID: The sad reality is the FCC can only do so much. Only the US Attorney can give the order to seize gear and bring charges. I do believe the FCC did react to complaints from people who wanted to hear WJIB on FM but Big City moved off 101.3 because Bob's new licensed translator cut their signal in half. On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:11 AM, A Joseph Ross wrote: > But there are different individual names on the notice. I guess there are > more than one person running the station. > > On 9/12/2017 9:00 PM, Jeff Lehmann wrote: > >> No, just two different notices for each one. 101.3 (now 100.3), 105.3, >> and 87.7 are all at the same location. >> >> Jeff Lehmann >> >> >> > -- > A. Joseph Ross, J.D. | 1340 Centre Street, Suite 103 | Newton, MA 0 > > 2459 > 617.367.0468 | Fx:617.507.7856 | http://www.attorneyross.com > From 011010001@interpring.com Wed Sep 13 06:35:03 2017 From: 011010001@interpring.com (Rob Landry) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 06:35:03 -0400 (EDT) Subject: The FCC Enforcement Bureau Has Been Busy... In-Reply-To: <005701d32bfc$93088b40$b919a1c0$@skywaves.net> References: <005701d32bfc$93088b40$b919a1c0$@skywaves.net> Message-ID: They missed the guy operating on 103.1 MHz in Natick Center. He calls himself "Cowboy de Rondonia". Rob From brian_vita@cssinc.com Wed Sep 13 08:20:06 2017 From: brian_vita@cssinc.com (Brian Vita) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 08:20:06 -0400 Subject: The FCC Enforcement Bureau Has Been Busy... In-Reply-To: <035101d32c2b$a6adcbe0$f40963a0$@comcast.net> References: <005701d32bfc$93088b40$b919a1c0$@skywaves.net> <035101d32c2b$a6adcbe0$f40963a0$@comcast.net> Message-ID: <00e601d32c8a$a6a645a0$f3f2d0e0$@cssinc.com> Wow. A pirate cluster. Look out Greater Medai. -----Original Message----- From: Boston-Radio-Interest [mailto:boston-radio-interest-bounces@lists.BostonRadio.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Lehmann Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 9:00 PM To: 'A. Joseph Ross' ; boston-radio-interest@lists.BostonRadio.org Subject: RE: The FCC Enforcement Bureau Has Been Busy... No, just two different notices for each one. 101.3 (now 100.3), 105.3, and 87.7 are all at the same location. Jeff Lehmann From bob.bosra@demattia.net Wed Sep 13 09:42:21 2017 From: bob.bosra@demattia.net (Bob DeMattia) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 09:42:21 -0400 Subject: The FCC Enforcement Bureau Has Been Busy... In-Reply-To: References: <005701d32bfc$93088b40$b919a1c0$@skywaves.net> Message-ID: Is the Worcester pirate on 105.5 finally gone? I didn't hear it the other day when I was driving through. -Bob On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Rob Landry <011010001@interpring.com> wrote: > > They missed the guy operating on 103.1 MHz in Natick Center. He calls > himself "Cowboy de Rondonia". > > > Rob > > From dave@skywaves.net Wed Sep 13 11:53:30 2017 From: dave@skywaves.net (Dave Doherty) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 11:53:30 -0400 Subject: The FCC Enforcement Bureau Has Been Busy... In-Reply-To: References: <005701d32bfc$93088b40$b919a1c0$@skywaves.net> Message-ID: <004b01d32ca8$726e5e80$574b1b80$@skywaves.net> I haven?t heard them in a while, but I don?t listen for them on a regular basis. I?ll check it this afternoon when I run some errands. -d From: rjd444@gmail.com [mailto:rjd444@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Bob DeMattia Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 9:42 AM To: Rob Landry <011010001@interpring.com> Cc: Dave Doherty ; Boston Radio Subject: Re: The FCC Enforcement Bureau Has Been Busy... Is the Worcester pirate on 105.5 finally gone? I didn't hear it the other day when I was driving through. -Bob On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Rob Landry <011010001@interpring.com > wrote: They missed the guy operating on 103.1 MHz in Natick Center. He calls himself "Cowboy de Rondonia". Rob From raccoonradio@gmail.com Wed Sep 13 06:58:33 2017 From: raccoonradio@gmail.com (Bob Nelson) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 06:58:33 -0400 Subject: The FCC Enforcement Bureau Has Been Busy... In-Reply-To: References: <005701d32bfc$93088b40$b919a1c0$@skywaves.net> <035101d32c2b$a6adcbe0$f40963a0$@comcast.net> <46268610-004f-fa2f-a45c-218926839ffe@attorneyross.com> Message-ID: One NOUO said they found 101.3 broadcasting illegally on August 14. W267CE (740 // 101.3) started on August 4. Around August 16 it was noticed Big City had shut off 101.3...but the letter was issued yesterday. A couple of the names on these letters had gotten multiple warnings before. A site called diymedia.net has a regular "FCC Enforcement Database" over several years and can be searched for these letters, etc.; most say warnings, a few mention fines issued on once in a great while FCC and other agencies with proper issued authority, shut pirates down. On Wednesday, September 13, 2017, Kevin Vahey wrote: > The sad reality is the FCC can only do so much. Only the US Attorney can > give the order to seize gear and bring charges. I do believe the FCC did > react to complaints from people who wanted to hear WJIB on FM but Big City > moved off 101.3 because Bob's new licensed translator cut their signal in > half. > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:11 AM, A Joseph Ross > > wrote: > > > But there are different individual names on the notice. I guess there > are > > more than one person running the station. > > > > On 9/12/2017 9:00 PM, Jeff Lehmann wrote: > > > >> No, just two different notices for each one. 101.3 (now 100.3), 105.3, > >> and 87.7 are all at the same location. > >> > >> Jeff Lehmann > >> > >> > >> > > -- > > A. Joseph Ross, J.D. | 1340 Centre Street, Suite 103 | Newton, MA 0 > > 103+%7C+Newton,+MA+0&entry=gmail&source=g> > > 2459 > > 617.367.0468 | Fx:617.507.7856 | http://www.attorneyross.com > > > From dave@skywaves.net Wed Sep 13 14:15:26 2017 From: dave@skywaves.net (Dave Doherty) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 14:15:26 -0400 Subject: [Possible Spam(low)]-RE: The FCC Enforcement Bureau Has Been Busy... In-Reply-To: <004b01d32ca8$726e5e80$574b1b80$@skywaves.net> References: <005701d32bfc$93088b40$b919a1c0$@skywaves.net> <004b01d32ca8$726e5e80$574b1b80$@skywaves.net> Message-ID: <003c01d32cbc$46701260$d3503720$@skywaves.net> Not on this afternoon. -d -----Original Message----- From: Boston-Radio-Interest [mailto:boston-radio-interest-bounces@lists.BostonRadio.org] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 11:54 AM To: 'Bob DeMattia' ; 'Rob Landry' <011010001@interpring.com> Cc: 'Boston Radio' Subject: [Possible Spam(low)]-RE: The FCC Enforcement Bureau Has Been Busy... I haven?t heard them in a while, but I don?t listen for them on a regular basis. I?ll check it this afternoon when I run some errands. -d From: rjd444@gmail.com [mailto:rjd444@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Bob DeMattia Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 9:42 AM To: Rob Landry <011010001@interpring.com> Cc: Dave Doherty ; Boston Radio Subject: Re: The FCC Enforcement Bureau Has Been Busy... Is the Worcester pirate on 105.5 finally gone? I didn't hear it the other day when I was driving through. -Bob On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Rob Landry <011010001@interpring.com > wrote: They missed the guy operating on 103.1 MHz in Natick Center. He calls himself "Cowboy de Rondonia". Rob From Kaimbridge@Gmail.com Wed Sep 13 14:38:53 2017 From: Kaimbridge@Gmail.com (Kaimbridge M. GoldChild) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 18:38:53 +0000 Subject: [B-R-I] Re: The FCC Enforcement Bureau Has Been Busy... Message-ID: <516d35ee-c366-bf9f-aaa6-904d913412c6@Gmail.com> Something ain?t kosher here. https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346669A1.pdf 9A1> The field strength of your signal on frequency 101.3 MHz was measured 9A1> at 59,282 microvolts per meter (?V/m) at 202 meters, which exceeded the ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 9A1> maximum permitted level of 250 ?V/m at 3 meters for non-licensed devices. https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346668A1.pdf 8A1> The field strength of your signal on frequency 105.3 MHz was measured 8A1> at 80,583 microvolts per meter (?V/m) at 202 meters, which exceeded the ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 8A1> maximum permitted level of 250 ?V/m at 3 meters for non-licensed devices. https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346671A1.pdf 1A1> the field strength of your signal on frequency 104.7 MHz was measured 1A1> at 102,815 microvolts per meter (?V/m) at 3,135 meters, which exceeded the ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^!!! 1A1> maximum permitted level of 250 ?V/m at 3 meters for non-licensed devices. So, 101.3 MHz ? 59 mV/m at 202 m, 105.3 MHz ? 81 mV/m and 104.7 MHz ? 103 mV/m at over 3 km?!? I don?t think so! The one on 104.7 is nowhere as strong as the other two, and was measured over 15 times further away! Me thinks there is a typo somewheres? Maybe they meant 103 mV/m at 313.5 m (though even that still seems a little too strong, compared to the other two)? FWIW, 105.3 seems to have been a dead carrier for the past few days (they have been with a dc for hr.s at a time in the past, but not for days). ~Kaimbridge~ -- -- -- Wiki?Sites Contribution History Pages: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kaimbridge math.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kaimbridge wiki.gis.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/Kaimbridge rosettacode.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kaimbridge ***** Void Where Permitted; Limit 0 Per Customer. ***** From dave@skywaves.net Wed Sep 13 22:48:06 2017 From: dave@skywaves.net (Dave Doherty) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 22:48:06 -0400 Subject: [Possible Spam(low)]-[B-R-I] Re: The FCC Enforcement Bureau Has Been Busy... In-Reply-To: <516d35ee-c366-bf9f-aaa6-904d913412c6@Gmail.com> References: <516d35ee-c366-bf9f-aaa6-904d913412c6@Gmail.com> Message-ID: <002201d32d03$e4d989d0$ae8c9d70$@skywaves.net> I noticed a similar improbability on another NOV in Louisiana. It appears that somebody in the Enforcement Bureau has trouble with scaling. -d -----Original Message----- From: Boston-Radio-Interest [mailto:boston-radio-interest-bounces@lists.BostonRadio.org] On Behalf Of Kaimbridge M. GoldChild Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 2:39 PM To: Boston Radio Interest Subject: [Possible Spam(low)]-[B-R-I] Re: The FCC Enforcement Bureau Has Been Busy... Something ain?t kosher here. https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346669A1.pdf 9A1> The field strength of your signal on frequency 101.3 MHz was 9A1> measured at 59,282 microvolts per meter (?V/m) at 202 meters, which 9A1> exceeded the ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 9A1> maximum permitted level of 250 ?V/m at 3 meters for non-licensed devices. https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346668A1.pdf 8A1> The field strength of your signal on frequency 105.3 MHz was 8A1> measured at 80,583 microvolts per meter (?V/m) at 202 meters, which 8A1> exceeded the ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 8A1> maximum permitted level of 250 ?V/m at 3 meters for non-licensed devices. https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346671A1.pdf 1A1> the field strength of your signal on frequency 104.7 MHz was 1A1> measured at 102,815 microvolts per meter (?V/m) at 3,135 meters, 1A1> which exceeded the ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^!!! 1A1> maximum permitted level of 250 ?V/m at 3 meters for non-licensed devices. So, 101.3 MHz ? 59 mV/m at 202 m, 105.3 MHz ? 81 mV/m and 104.7 MHz ? 103 mV/m at over 3 km?!? I don?t think so! The one on 104.7 is nowhere as strong as the other two, and was measured over 15 times further away! Me thinks there is a typo somewheres? Maybe they meant 103 mV/m at 313.5 m (though even that still seems a little too strong, compared to the other two)? FWIW, 105.3 seems to have been a dead carrier for the past few days (they have been with a dc for hr.s at a time in the past, but not for days). ~Kaimbridge~ -- -- -- Wiki?Sites Contribution History Pages: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kaimbridge math.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kaimbridge wiki.gis.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/Kaimbridge rosettacode.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kaimbridge ***** Void Where Permitted; Limit 0 Per Customer. ***** From sids1045@aol.com Wed Sep 13 23:19:45 2017 From: sids1045@aol.com (Sid Schweiger) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 23:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Possible Spam(low)]-[B-R-I] Re: The FCC Enforcement Bureau Has Been Busy... In-Reply-To: <002201d32d03$e4d989d0$ae8c9d70$@skywaves.net> Message-ID: <15e7e6641f7-c0a-684fe@webjas-vac070.srv.aolmail.net> "So, 101.3 MHz ? 59 mV/m at 202 m, 105.3 MHz ? 81 mV/m and 104.7 MHz ? 103 mV/m at over 3 km?!? I don?t think so! The one on 104.7 is nowhere as strong as the other two, and was measured over 15 times further away! Me thinks there is a typo somewheres? Maybe they meant 103 mV/m at 313.5 m (though even that still seems a little too strong, compared to the other two)?" You're making an assumption which is unsupported by facts. The only way this is a valid comparison is if the ERP and transmitting antenna configurations are identical for all three stations, and since that information is not contained in the NUOU's, that cannot be assumed. Each of those field strength measurements is well within the realm of possibility.