WBTS and WHDH
A Joseph Ross
Wed Jan 4 01:26:40 EST 2017
Channel 38 was widely carried on cable systems long before it was
co-owned by WBZ and long before WBZ was owned by CBS.
On 1/3/2017 10:55 AM, Bob DeMattia wrote:
> This could be CBS saying if you want to carry WBZ you have to carry 38
> or pricing such that carrying 38 is a better option than just BZ by itself.
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Sean Smyth <email@example.com> wrote:
>> One of the main reasons Channel 38 became so widely carried was the Bruins
>> and Red Sox, and later the Celtics. It's been years since any of those
>> teams had a local broadcast TV package.
>> On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 12:24 PM Doug Drown <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> It has occurred to me that there may be a silver lining for WHDH amidst
>>> this kerfuffle over the affiliation loss. What if WHDH were to give
>>> Comcast and NECN some significant competition outside Boston? According
>>> what I've been reading, the station plans to significantly beef up its
>>> operation; what if it were to become a "superstation" comparable to WSBK
>>> and WGN, offering Boston and New England news to the rest of the region
>>> (and Canada) via Time Warner and other non-Comcast-owned cable companies,
>>> as well as via satellite? DISH and DIRECTV don't carry NECN; it's a
>>> cable-only operation. I think this could be a great opportunity for
>>> if it could be worked out.
>> Sent from my iPhone
A. Joseph Ross, J.D. | 1340 Centre Street, Suite 103 | Newton, MA 02459
617.367.0468 | Fx:617.507.7856 | http://www.attorneyross.com
More information about the Boston-Radio-Interest