[B-R-I] Re: 60.5

[Kaimbridge M. GoldChild]

I understand the channel dynamics,

      CALLs:VirCh–RF-Ch
      ――――――――――――――――
       WNEU:60–34   (Legal Prgm Orig.)
    WBTS-LD:08–46   (WNEU Xltr)
    WBTS-LD:60.5–18 (essentially WBTS-LD Xltr)
     (=WMFP:62)

but given that:

    * RF-18 isnʼt using VirCh-62.2 or 62.5;
    * WNEU:60 in no way, shape or form is
      receivable in Metro Boston (which is
      why WBTS-LD:08 was created);
    * VirCh-60.5 IDʼs as “WBTS-LD”;

Why doesnʼt RF-18 map to either VirCh-62.2 or 62.5
or, even better, VirCh-8.5?—or is the latter an FCC no-no?

      ~Kaimbridge~

-- -- --
      Wiki—Sites Contribution History Pages:

        en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kaimbridge
          math.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kaimbridge
  wiki.gis.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/Kaimbridge
         rosettacode.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kaimbridge

      *****  Void Where Permitted; Limit 0 Per Customer.  *****