101.7 flipping - anyone rolling?
Scott Fybush
scott@fybush.com
Mon Jun 16 17:43:41 EDT 2014
On 6/16/2014 4:05 PM, Bill O'Neill wrote:
> The Bull? Really? What I'd pay for secret audio of that decision meeting
> that gave birth to that bon mot.
>
> Bill O'Neill
The name itself seems pretty unremarkable to me. There's certainly
plenty of association between bulls and country music - rodeos, cowboys,
mechanical bulls at country and western bars, and so on. It's a brand
Clear Channel has used with considerable success on long-running country
stations in other markets: KSD (93.7) in St. Louis and WBUL (98.1) in
Lexington, Kentucky come immediately to mind as Clear Channel "Bull" FM
stations that have thrived with the brand for a decade or longer. Other
more recent Clear Channel Bulls include Atlanta, Birmingham, Las Vegas,
Wichita and Defiance, Ohio.
Like "Kiss," it's a brand that has been around long enough that its use
with country radio predated Clear Channel in other markets. I'm not sure
if there's still a Bull in Reno, for instance, but there was a KBUL
doing country there as far back as the early 1990s under a different
owner. (A quick check shows KBUL is still doing country there on 98.1,
and is in fact now owned by Clear Channel.)
There's a CBS Bull in Houston (KILT-FM 100.3), a prominent Bull in
Portland, Oregon (KUPL 98.7), and so on.
I know of at least one Canadian "Bull," too, in Wingham, Ontario (I
think it's flipped to something else since.)
It is, in any event, a brand that's well established in Clear Channel's
stable, so there probably wasn't much of a meeting or decision process
that led to it appearing on 101.7, any more than there would be if CC
launched a new top-40 somewhere and named it "Kiss" or "Now," or a new
talker as "The Patriot."
More information about the Boston-Radio-Interest
mailing list