OTA re-transmission

Garrett Wollman wollman@bimajority.org
Wed Jul 2 18:30:47 EDT 2014

<<On Wed, 2 Jul 2014 17:28:26 -0400, Bob Nelson <raccoonradio@gmail.com> said:

> People were saying Aereo was no different than putting up rabbit ears or a
> roof antenna.


What people (and Aereo) were saying was that Aereo was renting
equipment (an antenna and a DVR) to its customers, not providing a
video distribution service.

The Supreme Court majority thought that this didn't matter; they know
a cable company when they see one, and Aereo was a cable company.


More information about the Boston-Radio-Interest mailing list